Submit ideas to Hopkins inHealth Shark Tank by April 20

Are you developing the next big health app?  Do you have an idea for an app that can improve health care delivery?

A five minute pitch.  Five minutes of feedback.  A chance to win $5,000.

Join Hopkins inHealth for a home town version of Shark Tank with experts from the Bloomberg School of Public Health, School of Medicine, Whiting School of Engineering, Technology Ventures and Johns Hopkins Health Systems. The top three to five ideas will be awarded up to $5,000 each.

Slide1If you are a graduate student, medical student, postdoctoral fellow, or medical resident or fellow, this is your chance to share your innovative idea, receive feedback, and possibly win funds to kick start the development or commercialization of your app.

Participation Details

Submit a one-page summary of your app to Risha Zuckerman, rzuckerman@jhu.edu, by Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 11:59pm. The summary must include the following sections:

·      Impact: A concise description of the relevant background information and significance of the project.

·      Targets: A succinct statement of the project’s aims and anticipated outcomes.

Action Plan: A short statement of your next steps or commercialization plan.
Budget: A brief outline of how the $5,000 award would be spent.
The Hopkins inHealth team will review your summary to determine whether to invite you to proceed to the next stage and present before the panel. Presentation times will be assigned.

 

Timeline

April 20, 2016:           Deadline for submission

April 29, 2016:           Notification of assigned presentation time slot

May 4, 2016:               10:00am – 12:00pm; [LOCATION TBD]; Day 1 of event

May 5, 2016:               1:00 – 3:00pm; [LOCATION TBD]; Day 2 of event

May 11, 2016:             Announcement of awardees

 

About Hopkins inHealth:

The mission of Hopkins inHealth is to support research that will, with increasing accuracy and precision, define, measure, and communicate each person’s unique health state and the trajectory along which it is changing, and to develop these discoveries into new methods that can be used to inform decision-making in clinical and public health practice. The goal of this individualization of health care is to reach a state of optimal health for every individual, achieved through a continuum of efforts that span health promotion, disease prevention, early detection, and effective intervention.

Beauty is in the eye of the microscopist

Scientists have been using microscopes to produce up-close views and gather data about cells and other tiny things for more than 400 years. Many times, however, those images are not just informative, they are beautiful.

actin

Actin network in mouse fibroblast (Image by Dong-Hwee Kim)

Dong-Hwee Kim, a postdoctoral fellow in the Institute for NanoBioTechnology in the Whiting School of Engineering, frequently uses microscopy in his research on cell mechanics, a field he describes as “one of the fastest growing interdisciplinary fields in biology.”

Several of his images have not only yielded abundant quantitative and qualitative data, but they have netted him awards for scientific imaging.

In 2011 he earned an Image of Distinction Award from the Nikon Small World Competition for his photo of a dis-organized perinuclear actin cap stress fibers in a mouse embryonic fibroblast. That same year, he was awarded an Honorable mention from the American Society for Cell Biology 7th Annual Cell Biology film contest for his movie “Hurricane: Cell Cytoplasm Movements”. And in 2013, Kim took second place in the Biophysical Society’s, The Art of Science Image Contest for his dandelion-like representation of the geodesic actin network in a mouse fibroblast.

Kim says his primary focus in collecting these images has always been purely for scientific purposes. “I am trying to better understand how cells recognize the physical properties of the cell environment and respond to them,” he said.

Engineers have developed theories about cell mechanics and about what they expect to happen at the single cell level. But instead of describing the cell’s response with a computational model or other simulation, Kim was determined to capture actual images of live cells reacting to their surroundings.

Perinuclear actin cap stress fibers in a mouse embryonic fibroblast (Image by Dong-Hween Kim)

Perinuclear actin cap stress fibers in a mouse embryonic fibroblast (Image by Dong-Hwee Kim)

“Direct visualization of cell functions has become one of the most effective ways to support scientific findings, since it is the simplest but most powerful way to con-vince others,” he said.

Using various microscopy techniques, Kim has been able to visualize cell components, such as the nucleus or actin filaments, in very detailed ways. “It is always exciting to become the first one to show something that others haven’t seen yet,” he said.

Denis Wirtz, Kim’s advisor, noticed how beautiful the postdoc’s images were and suggested that he enter some of his work into popular imaging contests. Each contest focuses on a different theme, but the bottom line is that the images must be scientifically relevant as well as visually interesting. For example, the image of the geodesic actin network in the mouse embryonic fibroblasts, which were used for both the Nikon and Biophysical Society image contests, “directly visualized the mechanical and spatial coordinates of filamentous actin cytoskeleton in the cell,” said Kim. But the images also happen to be reminiscent of dandelions and fireworks.

Even if making a pretty picture is not the intent of the image, Kim thinks that having an artistic eye is important in science.

“I think artistic images in science should be based on a combination of aesthetic discrimination and scientific significance, which gives them unparalleled power to support scientific findings and persuade others,” Kim said.

The old saying goes, “a picture is worth 1,000 words.” In this case an expertly executed scientific image “can overcome myriad arguments,” Kim added.

Kim said his favorite imaging tool is the “confocal laser scanning microscopy, which allows high resolution images in cell biology, as well as qualitative and quantitative analysis of images.” He emphasizes that he does not use any software enhancements, such as Photoshop, to beautify his images. However, by attempting to create a beautiful image, he has developed several new imaging protocols.

“In challenging myself to create artistic images, it has sometimes led me to design new scientific methodologies that were not conventionally used in the field, and I think these efforts can contribute to the advancement of science,” Kim said.

This article was written by Mary Spiro, science writer for INBT at Johns Hopkins University, and first appeared in the 2013 issue of Nano-Bio Magazine.

 

Collagen video scores high in magazines reader’s choice vote

Screen capture from INBT’s video on collagen mimetic peptides.

The Scientist magazine has announced its annual Multimedia Awards—the Labbys—and Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology’s video on collagen mimetic peptides has been selected as a finalist. According to the voting, we are a strong second in the race. It appears voting is continuing well past the original June 30 deadline. So keep voting!

Help choose us as the top science video by going to this website (http://the-scientist.com/2011/06/15/2011-labby-video-finalists/#vote)  and selecting “Mimicking Collagen.” The video features Michael Yu, associate professor of materials science and engineering and some fantastic animations and illustration from INBT’s Animation studio. Animations in the video were created by Ella McCrea, a graduate from the Maryland Institute College of Art, and Nathan Weiss, a masters graduate from Johns Hopkins University.

Winners of the reader’s choice will be announced in the magazine and online in September. Top picks will also be chosen by The Scientist’s panel of judges, which includes the father of the infographic Nigel Holmes, Kirsten Sanford of the Science Channel (aka Dr. KiKi), Jeffrey Segall of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, and David Kirby of the University of Manchester.

You can only vote once, so share this link with your friends.

 

 

Voting for Johns Hopkins video in multimedia contest ends June 30

The Scientist magazine has announced its annual Multimedia Awards—the Labbies—and Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology’s video on collagen mimetic peptides has been selected as a finalist. But that just means we are in the finals. We need your vote to win!

Help choose us as the top science video by going to this website (http://ht.ly/5mZ9D) and voting for “Mimicking Collagen.” The video features Michael Yu, associate professor of materials science and engineering and some fantastic animations and illustration from INBT’s Animation studio.

Voting ends June 30, 2011 and winners of the reader’s choice will be announced in the magazine and online in September. Top picks will also be chosen by The Scientist’s panel of judges, which includes the father of the infographic Nigel Holmes, Kirsten Sanford of the Science Channel (aka Dr. KiKi), Jeffrey Segall of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York City, and David Kirby of the University of Manchester.

So vote now and often! Share this link with your friends.

Watch the video that made the Labby finals.

Collagen Mimetic Peptides