Three-way brain tumor therapy sparks immune system with radiation

Johns Hopkins researchers have found that combining radiation with two therapies that activate the immune system allow mice with brain tumors (glioblastoma) to survive longer than mice who did not receive the combo treatment. INBT affiliated faculty member Michael Lim, M.D., an associate professor of neurosurgery, oncology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, said the radiation may act “as kind of kindling, to try to induce an immune response.”

brainRead the full press release from Johns Hopkins regarding the publication in PLoS One journal below:

A triple therapy for glioblastoma, including two types of immunotherapy and targeted radiation, has significantly prolonged the survival of mice with these brain cancers, according to a new report by scientists at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center.

Mice with implanted, mouse-derived glioblastoma cells lived an average of 67 days after the triple therapy, compared with mice that lasted 24 days when they received only the two immunotherapies. Half of the mice who received the triple therapy lived 100 days or more and were protected against further tumors when new cancer cells were re-injected under the animals’ skins.

The combination treatment described in the July 11 issue of PLOS One consists of highly focused radiation therapy targeted specifically to the tumor and strategies that lift the brakes and activate the body’s immune system, allowing anti-cancer drugs to attack the tumor. One of the immunotherapies is an antibody that binds to and blocks an immune checkpoint molecule on T cells called CTLA-4, allowing the T-cells to infiltrate and fight tumor cells. The second immunotherapy, known as 4-1BB, supplies a positive “go” signal, stimulating anti-tumor T cells.

None of the treatments are new, but were used by the Johns Hopkins team to demonstrate the value of combining treatments that augment the immune response against glioblastomas, the most common brain tumors in human adults. The prognosis is generally poor, even with early treatment.

“We’re trying to find that optimal balance between pushing and pulling the immune system to kill cancer,” said Charles Drake, M.D., Ph.D., an associate professor of oncology, immunology and urology, and medical oncologist at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center.

The researchers speculate that when radiation destroys tumor cells, the dead tumor cells may release proteins that help train immune cells to recognize and attack the cancer, said Michael Lim, M.D., an associate professor of neurosurgery, oncology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and member of Johns Hopkins’ Institute of NanoBiotechnology.

“Traditionally, radiation is used as a definitive therapy to directly kill cancer cells,” said Lim, who also serves as director of the Brain Tumor Immunotherapy Program and director of the Metastatic Brain Tumor Center at Johns Hopkins Medicine. “But in this situation we’re using radiation as kind of kindling, to try to induce an immune response.”

Lim says if further studies affirm the value of the triple therapy in animals and humans, the radiation could be delivered a few days before or after the immunotherapies and still achieve the same results. Lim said this leeway “could make applications of this therapy in patients possible.”

The researchers say they were also encouraged to see that the triple therapy created “immune memory” in mice that were long-term survivors. When brain tumor cells were re-introduced under the skin of the animals, their immune systems appeared to protect them against the development of a new brain tumor.

Drake said since the immune system usually doesn’t generate a memory when foreign (tumor) cells are still present in the body. “But the idea that this combination treatment was successful at generating immunological memory really suggests that we could do this in patients and generate some long-term responses.”

The researchers are developing a variety of clinical trials to test combination therapies against brain tumors.

Other researchers on the study include Zineb Belcaid, Jillian A. Phallen, Alfred P. See, Dimitrios Mathios, Chelsea Gottschalk, Sarah Nicholas, Meghan Kellett, Jacob Ruzevick, Christopher Jackson, Xiaobu Ye, Betty Tyler, and Henry Brem of the Department of Neurosurgery at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Jing Zeng, Phuoc T. Tran, and John W. Wong of the Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center;  and Emilia Albesiano, Nicholas M. Durham, and Drew M. Pardoll at the Kimmel Center’s Department of Oncology and Medicine, Division of Immunology.

Funding for the study was provided by the WW Smith Charitable Foundation and individual patient donations.

Michael Lim is a consultant for Accuray and receives research funding from Accuray, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Celldex and Aegenus. Charles Drake has served as a consultant for Amplimmune, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Compugen, Dendreon, ImmunExcite and Roche/Genentech and is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Compugen. He receives research funding from Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Aduro and Janssen and has stock ownership in Compugen. Drew Pardoll is a consultant/advisor for Jounce Therapeutics, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, ImmuneXcite and Aduro and receives research funding from Bristol-Meyers Squibb. Jing Zeng, Michael Lim, Charles Drake and Drew Pardoll hold a patent for the work related to this study.

The authors declare that they have a patent relating to material pertinent to this article; this international patent application (PCT/US2012/043124) is entitled “Use of Adjuvant Focused Radiation Including Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Augmenting Immune Based Therapies Against Neoplasms.” These relationships are being managed by The Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.

For all press inquiries regarding INBT, its faculty and programs, contact Mary Spiro, mspiro@jhu.edu or 410-516-4802.

From bacterial intelligence to a cyber-war on cancer

Screen Shot 2014-03-18 at 11.40.42 AMINBT will host a special seminar, “From bacterial intelligence to a cyber-war on cancer,” on April 17 at 2 p.m. in Room 160 of the Mattin Center. The guest speaker is Eshel Ben-Jacob, PhD, professor and Maguy-Glass Chair in Physics of Complex Systems from Tel Aviv University. This event is free and open to the university community.

ABSTRACT: Cancer continues to elude us. Metastasis, relapse and drug resistance are all still poorly understood and clinically insuperable. Evidently, the prevailing paradigms need to be re-examined and out-of-the-box ideas ought to be explored. Drawing upon recent discoveries demonstrating the parallels between collective behaviors of bacteria and cancer, Dr. Ben-Jacob shall present a new picture of cancer as a society of smart communicating cells motivated by the realization of bacterial social intelligence. There is growing evidence that cancer cells, much like bacteria, rely on advanced communication, social networking and cooperation to grow, spread within the body, colonize new organs, relapse and develop drug resistance. Dr. Ben-Jacob shall address the role of communication, cooperation and decision-making in bacterial collective navigation, swarming logistics and colony development. This will lead to a new picture of cancer as a networked society of smart cells and to new understanding of the interplay between cancer and the immune system. Dr. Ben-Jacob shall reason that the new understanding calls for “a cyber-war” on cancer – the developments of drugs to target cancer communication and control.

Related Links:

Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence

Bacterial survival strategies suggest rethinking cancer cooperativity

 

 

Cancer spreads through ‘Rock’ and ‘Rho’

n low oxygen conditions, breast cancer cells form structures that facilitate movement, such as filaments that allow the cell to contract (green) and cellular ‘hands’ that grab surfaces to pull the cell along (red). Credit: Daniele Gilkes

In low oxygen conditions, breast cancer cells form structures that facilitate movement, such as filaments that allow the cell to contract (green) and cellular ‘hands’ that grab surfaces to pull the cell along (red).
Credit: Daniele Gilkes

ROCK1 and RhoA genes found partly to blame for cancer metastasis. Gregg Semenza, co-director of the Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center (PS-OC), led a team that made the discovery. The following comes from a Johns Hopkins press release:

Biologists at The Johns Hopkins University have discovered that low oxygen conditions, which often persist inside tumors, are sufficient to initiate a molecular chain of events that transforms breast cancer cells from being rigid and stationary to mobile and invasive. Their evidence, published online in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on Dec. 9, underlines the importance of hypoxia-inducible factors in promoting breast cancer metastasis.

“High levels of RhoA and ROCK1 were known to worsen outcomes for breast cancer patients by endowing cancer cells with the ability to move, but the trigger for their production was a mystery,” says Gregg Semenza, M.D., Ph.D., the C. Michael Armstrong Professor of Medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and senior author of the article. “We now know that the production of these proteins increases dramatically when breast cancer cells are exposed to low oxygen conditions.”

To move, cancer cells must make many changes to their internal structures, Semenza says. Thin, parallel filaments form throughout the cells, allowing them to contract and cellular “hands” arise, allowing cells to “grab” external surfaces to pull themselves along. The proteins RhoA and ROCK1 are known to be central to the formation of these structures.

Moreover, the genes that code for RhoA and ROCK1 were known to be turned on at high levels in human cells from metastatic breast cancers. In a few cases, those increased levels could be traced back to a genetic error in a protein that controls them, but not in most. This activity, said Semenza, led him and his team to search for another cause for their high levels.

What the study showed is that low oxygen conditions, which are frequently present in breast cancers, serve as the trigger to increase the production of RhoA and ROCK1 through the action of hypoxia-inducible factors.

“As tumor cells multiply, the interior of the tumor begins to run out of oxygen because it isn’t being fed by blood vessels,” explains Semenza. “The lack of oxygen activates the hypoxia-inducible factors, which are master control proteins that switch on many genes that help cells adapt to the scarcity of oxygen.” He explains that, while these responses are essential for life, hypoxia-inducible factors also turn on genes that help cancer cells escape from the oxygen-starved tumor by invading blood vessels, through which they spread to other parts of the body.

Daniele Gilkes, Ph.D., a postdoctoral fellow at the PS-OC and lead author of the report, analyzed human metastatic breast cancer cells grown in low oxygen conditions in the laboratory. She found that the cells were much more mobile in the presence of low levels of oxygen than at physiologically normal levels. They had three times as many filaments and many more “hands” per cell. When the hypoxia-inducible factor protein levels were knocked down, though, the tumor cells hardly moved at all. The numbers of filaments and “hands” in the cells and their ability to contract were also decreased.

When Gilkes measured the levels of the RhoA and ROCK1 proteins, she saw a big increase in the levels of both proteins in cells grown in low oxygen. When the breast cancer cells were modified to knock down the amount of hypoxia-inducible factors, however, the levels of RhoA and ROCK1 were decreased, indicating a direct relationship between the two sets of proteins. Further experiments confirmed that hypoxia-inducible factors actually bind to the RhoA and ROCK1 genes to turn them on.

The team then took advantage of a database that allowed them to ask whether having RhoA and ROCK1 genes turned on in breast cancer cells affected patient survival. They found that women with high levels of RhoA or ROCK1, and especially those women with high levels of both, were much more likely to die of breast cancer than those with low levels.

“We have successfully decreased the mobility of breast cancer cells in the lab by using genetic tricks to knock the hypoxia-inducible factors down,” says Gilkes. “Now that we understand the mechanism at play, we hope that clinical trials will be performed to test whether drugs that inhibit hypoxia-inducible factors will have the double effect of blocking production of RhoA and ROCK1 and preventing metastases in women with breast cancer.”

Other authors of the report include Lisha Xiang, Sun Joo Lee, Pallavi Chaturvedi, Maimon Hubbi and Denis Wirtz of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

This work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute (U54-CA143868), the Johns Hopkins Institute for Cell Engineering, the American Cancer Society and the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation.

Picture this: Transcription ‘twists’ toward metastasis

Mol Cancer Res Cover (1)

Molecular Cancer Research Cover

Researchers associated with Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and School of Public Health have published “The Twist Box Domain Is Required for Twist1-induced Prostate Cancer Metastasis,” in a recent issue of the journal Molecular Cancer Research. An illustration related to the work graced the cover.

Authors on the paper include co-lead authors Rajendra P. Gajula and Sivarajan T. Chettiar,  as well as Russell D. Williams, Saravanan Thiyagarajan, Yoshinori Kato, Khaled Aziz, Ruoqi Wang, Nishant Gandhi, Aaron T. Wild, Farhad Vesuna, Jinfang Ma, Tarek Salih, Jessica Cades, Elana Fertig, Shyam Biswal, Timothy F. Burns, Christine H. Chung, Charles M. Rudin, Joseph M. Herman, Russell K. Hales, Venu Raman, Steven S. An and corresponding author Phuoc T. Tran

Here is an abstract of their paper and caption for the cover:

“Twist1 plays key roles during development and is a master transcriptional regulator of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition that promotes cancer metastasis. We demonstrated three important findings in prostate cancer cells that overexpress Twist1: (1) Twist1 leads to elevated cytoskeletal stiffness and traction forces at the migratory edge of cell collections; (2) The Twist box domain is required for Twist1-induced pro-metastatic in vitro properties and in vivo metastases; and (3) Hoxa9 is a novel Twist1 transcriptional target that is required for Twist1-induced pro-metastatic phenotypes. Targeting the Twist box domain and Hoxa9 may effectively limit prostate cancer metastatic potential.”

Visit the journal here: Molecular Cancer Research 

 

Veltri presents PS-OC hosted talk on digital pathology and prostate cancer

Robert Veltri, associate professor Of Urology and Oncology at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and Director of the Fisher Biomarker Biorepository Laboratory, will  present the talk Quantitative Histomorphometry of Digital Pathology: Case study in prostate cancer,” to members of the Denis Wirtz Lab and the Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center on Monday, December 9 at 2 p.m. in Croft G40 on the Homewood campus. Seating is limited.

veltri

Robert Veltri

Veltri studies the biomarkers for prostate and bladder cancer and is collaborating on applications of Quantitative Digital Image Analysis (QDIA) using microscopy to quantify nuclear structure and tissue architecture. Collaborations include Case Western Reserve University biomedical engineering and the University of Pittsburgh Electrical Engineering departments studying to assess cancer aggressiveness in prostate cancer (PCa). Furthermore,  he is studying the application of molecular biomarkers for prostate (CaP) and bladder cancer (BlCa) detection and prognosis. Veltri’s work is funded by the National Cancer Institute’s PS-OC program grant), Early Detection Research Network (EDRN), and the Department of Defense related to research on Active Surveillance for PCa. He is also a co-investigator on a SBIR-I and II grant studying the application of microtransponders to multiplex molecular urine and serum biomarker testing for CaP.  Veltri has authored over 152 scientific publications and is either inventor or co-inventor on over twenty patents and two trademarks.

In cancer fight, one sportsball-shaped particle works better than another

Apparently in the quest to treat or cure cancer, football trumps basketball. Research from the laboratory of Jordan Green, Ph.D., assistant professor of biomedical engineering at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, has shown that elliptical football-shaped microparticles do a better job than basketball-shaped ones in triggering an immune response that attacks cancer cells.

football particles-greenGreen collaborated with Jonathan Schneck, M.D., Ph.D., professor of pathology, medicine and oncology. Both are affiliated faculty members of Johns Hopkins Institute for NanoBioTechnology. Their work was published in the journal Biomaterials on Oct 5.

The particles, which are essentially artificial antigen presenting cells (APCs), are dotted with tumor proteins (antigens) that signal trouble to the immune response. It turns out that flattening the spherical particles into more elliptical, football-like shapes provides more opportunities for the fabricated APCs to come into contact with cells, which helps initiate a stronger immune response.

If you think about it, this makes sense. You can’t tackle someone on the basketball court the way you can on the gridiron.

Read the Johns Hopkins press release here:

FOOTBALL-SHAPED PARTICLES BOLSTER THE BODY’S DEFENSE AGAINST CANCER

Read the journal article here:

Particle shape dependence of CD8+ T cell activation by artificial antigen presenting cells

ChemBE seminar focuses on cancer research innovation

The Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering’s  scheduled Thursday, October 10 seminar will continue as planned at 3:30 PM in Maryland Hall 110. Jerry Lee, the Health Sciences Director at the National Cancer Institute (National Institutes of Health) will present his lecture “Advancing Convergence and Innovation in Cancer Research: National Cancer Institute Center for Strategic Scientific Initiatives (CSSI).”  A small reception will follow in Maryland Hall 109.

Jerry Lee

Jerry S.H. Lee, Ph.D

ABSTRACT

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Center for Strategic Scientific Initiatives (CSSI) is a component of the NCI’s Office of the Director focused on emerging advanced technologies that have the potential of uniquely impacting the full spectrum of cancer basic and clinical research. The Center is tasked with planning, developing, executing, and implementing rapid strategic scientific and technology initiatives that keep the Institute ahead of the scientific curve with respect to potential new exciting areas and discoveries. This may involve direct development and application of advanced technologies, synergy of large scale and individual initiated research, and/or using available federal mechanisms to forge novel partnerships that emphasize innovation, trans-disciplinary teams and convergence of scientific disciplines. With an emphasis on complementing the scientific efforts of other NCI divisions, CSSI’s efforts seek to enable the translation of discoveries into new interventions, both domestically and in the international arena, to detect, prevent and treat cancer more effectively. This presentation will highlight various programs and their associated accomplishments within CSSI’s broad scientific portfolio of programs (Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium, Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer, Physical Sciences-Oncology Centers, Innovative Molecular Analysis Technologies, and Provocative Questions) and describe future directions and opportunities.

Game Theory and Cancer

What does game theory and cancer have to do with each other. I am not sure but this interesting workshop hosted by the Princeton Physical Sciences-Oncology Center and Johns Hopkins University might help you figure that out.

An announcement about the event reads:

Screen Shot 2013-08-02 at 12.03.06 PMRegistration is now open for the Workshop on Game Theory and Cancer, scheduled on August 12-13 in Baltimore, MD, and jointly hosted by our Princeton PS-OC and Johns Hopkins University. The main goal of this workshop is to provide a dialogue between leading basic researchers and clinical investigators that would help make headway against the very stubborn problem of cancer, and to jolt the oncology community into confronting the serious clinical problems that have previously been avoided.

The flyer is pretty cool, too.  Check it out here.

Additional information and preliminary agenda can be found at: http://www.princeton.edu/psoc/training/

To register, please go to: https://prism.princeton.edu/ps-oc/regform.php

For questions about the event, email maranzam@princeton.edu or sclam@princeton.edu

Landmark physical characterization of cancer cells completed

An enormous collaborative effort between a multitude of academic and research centers has characterized numerous physical and mechanical properties on one identical human cancer cell line. Their two-year cooperative study, published online in the April 26, 2013 journal Science Reports, reveals the persistent and agile nature of human cancer cells as compared to noncancerous cells. It also represents a major shift in the way scientific research can be accomplished.

Human breast cancer cells like these were used in the study. (Image created by Shyam Khatau/ Wirtz Lab)

Human breast cancer cells like these were used in the study. (Image created by Shyam Khatau/ Wirtz Lab)

The research, which was conducted by 12 federally funded Physical Sciences-Oncology Centers (PS-OC) sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, is a systematic comparison of metastatic human breast-cancer cells to non-metastatic breast cells that reveals dramatic differences between the two cell lines in their mechanics, migration, oxygen response, protein production and ability to stick to surfaces. They have also discovered new insights into how human cells make the transition from nonmalignant to metastatic, a process that is not well understood.

Denis Wirtz, a Johns Hopkins professor of chemical and biomolecular engineering with joint appointments in pathology and oncology who is the corresponding author on the study, remarked that the work adds a tremendous amount of information about the physical nature of cancer cells. “For the first time ever, scientists got together and have created THE phenotypic signature of cancer” Wirtz said. “Yes, it was just one metastatic cell line, and it will require validation with many other cell lines. But we now have an extremely rich signature containing many parameters that are distinct when looking at metastatic and nonmetastatic cells.”

Wirtz, who directs the Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center, also noted the unique way in which this work was conducted: all centers used the same human cell line for their studies, which makes the quality of the results unparalleled. And, since human and not animal cells were used, the findings are immediately relevant to the development of drugs for the treatment of human disease.

“Cancer cells may nominally be derived from the same patient, but in actuality they will be quite different because cells drift genetically over just a few passages,” Wirtz said.  “This makes any measurement on them from different labs like comparing apples and oranges.” In this study, however, the genetic integrity of the cell lines were safeguarded by limiting the number times the original cell cultures could be regrown before they were discarded.

The nationwide PS-OC brings together researchers from physics, engineering, computer science, cancer biology and chemistry to solve problems in cancer, said Nastaran Zahir Kuhn, PS-OC program manager at the National Cancer Institute.

“The PS-OC program aims to bring physical sciences tools and perspectives into cancer research,” Kuhn said. “The results of this study demonstrate the utility of such an approach, particularly when studies are conducted in a standardized manner from the beginning.”

For the nationwide project, nearly 100 investigators from 20 institutions and laboratories conducted their experiments using the same two cell lines, reagents and protocols to assure that results could be compared. The experimental methods ranged from physical measurements of how the cells push on surrounding cells to measurements of gene and protein expression.

“Roughly 20 techniques were used to study the cell lines, enabling identification of a number of unique relationships between observations,” Kuhn said.

Wirtz added that it would have been logistically impossible for a single institution to employ all of these different techniques and to measure all of these different parameters on just one identical cell line. That means that this work accomplished in just two years what might have otherwise taken ten, he said.

The Johns Hopkins PS-OC made specific contributions to this work. Using particle-tracking microrheology, in which nanospheres are embedded in the cell’s cytoplasm and random cell movement is visually monitored, they measured the mechanical properties of cancerous versus noncancerous cells. They found that highly metastatic breast cancer cells were mechanically softer and more compliant than cells of less metastatic potential.

Using 3D cell culturing techniques, they analyzed the spontaneous migratory potential (that is, migration without the stimulus of any chemical signal) of cancerous versus noncancerous cells. They also analyzed the extracellular matrix molecules that were deposited by the two cell lines and found that cancerous cells deposited more hyaluronic acid (HA). The HA, in turn, affects motility, polarization and differentiation of cells.  Finally, the Hopkins team measured the level of expression of CD44, a cell surface receptor that recognizes HA, and found that metastatic cells express more CD44.

The next steps, Wirtz said, would be to validate these results using other metastatic cell lines.  To read the paper, which is published in an open access journal, follow this link: http://www.nature.com/srep/2013/130422/srep01449/full/srep01449.html

Excerpts from original press release by Princeton science writer Morgan Kelly were used.

 

 

 

 

Recent publications from the Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center

Johns Hopkins Physical Sciences-Oncology Center has had a productive quarter publishing from February to May 2013. Here are some of the most recent publications in support or the center’s core research projects, including a huge collaborative work drawing on the knowledge and research findings of the entire PS-OC network.

Screen Shot 2013-05-15 at 4.27.37 PMThat paper, A physical sciences network characterization of non-tumorigenic and metastatic cells, was the work of 95 authors from all 12 of the National Cancer Institute’s PS-OC  program centers. JHU’s PS-OC director Denis Wirtz, the Theophilus H. Smoot Professor in the Johns Hopkins Department of Chemical and Ciomolecular Engineering, is the corresponding author on this massive effort. We will be discussing the findings of that paper in a future post here on the PS-OC website. Until then, here is a link to that network paper and 13 other recent publications from the Johns Hopkins PS-OC.

  • A physical sciences network characterization of non-tumorigenic and metastatic cells.Physical Sciences – Oncology Centers Network, Agus DB, Alexander JF, Arap W,Ashili S, Aslan JE, Austin RH, Backman V, Bethel KJ, Bonneau R, Chen WC,Chen-Tanyolac C, Choi NC, Curley SA, Dallas M, Damania D, Davies PC, Decuzzi P,Dickinson L, Estevez-Salmeron L, Estrella V, Ferrari M, Fischbach C, Foo J,Fraley SI, Frantz C, Fuhrmann A, Gascard P, Gatenby RA, Geng Y, Gerecht S,Gillies RJ, Godin B, Grady WM, Greenfield A, Hemphill C, Hempstead BL, HielscherA, Hillis WD, Holland EC, Ibrahim-Hashim A, Jacks T, Johnson RH, Joo A, Katz JE,Kelbauskas L, Kesselman C, King MR, Konstantopoulos K, Kraning-Rush CM, Kuhn P,Kung K, Kwee B, Lakins JN, Lambert G, Liao D, Licht JD, Liphardt JT, Liu L, LloydMC, Lyubimova A, Mallick P, Marko J, McCarty OJ, Meldrum DR, Michor F,Mumenthaler SM, Nandakumar V, O’Halloran TV, Oh S, Pasqualini R, Paszek MJ,Philips KG, Poultney CS, Rana K, Reinhart-King CA, Ros R, Semenza GL, Senechal P,Shuler ML, Srinivasan S, Staunton JR, Stypula Y, Subramanian H, Tlsty TD, TormoenGW, Tseng Y, van Oudenaarden A, Verbridge SS, Wan JC, Weaver VM, Widom J, Will C, Wirtz D, Wojtkowiak J, Wu PH.  Sci Rep. 2013 Apr 25;3:1449. doi:10.1038/srep01449. PubMed PMID: 23618955; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3636513. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23618955
  • Procollagen Lysyl Hydroxylase 2 Is Essential for Hypoxia-Induced Breast Cancer Metastasis. Gilkes DM, Bajpai S, Wong CC, Chaturvedi P, Hubbi ME, Wirtz D, Semenza GL.Mol Cancer Res. 2013 May 7. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 23378577. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23378577
  • Predicting how cells spread and migrate: Focal adhesion size does matter. Kim DH, Wirtz D. Cell Adh Migr. 2013 Apr 29;7(3). [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 23628962. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23628962
  • Hypoxia-inducible Factor 1 (HIF-1) Promotes Extracellular Matrix Remodeling under Hypoxic Conditions by Inducing P4HA1, P4HA2, and PLOD2 Expression in Fibroblasts. Gilkes DM, Bajpai S, Chaturvedi P, Wirtz D, Semenza GL. J Biol   Chem. 2013 Apr 12;288(15):10819-29. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.442939. Epub 2013 Feb 19. PubMed PMID: 23423382; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3624462. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23423382
  • Perivascular cells in blood vessel regeneration. Wanjare M, Kusuma S, Gerecht S. Biotechnol J. 2013 Apr;8(4):434-47. doi: 10.1002/biot.201200199. PubMed PMID: 23554249. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23554249
  • Focal adhesion size uniquely predicts cell migration. Kim DH, Wirtz D. FASEB J. 2013 Apr;27(4):1351-61. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-220160. Epub 2012 Dec 19. PubMed PMID: 23254340; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3606534. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23254340
  • Notch4-dependent Antagonism of Canonical TGFβ1  Signaling Defines Unique Temporal Fluctuations of SMAD3 Activity in Sheared Proximal Tubular Epithelial Cells. Grabias BM, Konstantopoulos K. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013 Apr 10. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 23576639. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576639
  • Integration and regression of implanted engineered human vascular networks during deep wound healing. Hanjaya-Putra D, Shen YI, Wilson A, Fox-Talbot K, Khetan S, Burdick JA, Steenbergen C, Gerecht S. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2013 Apr;2(4):297-306. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2012-0111. Epub 2013 Mar 13. PubMed PMID: 23486832. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23486832
  • Collagen Prolyl Hydroxylases are Essential for Breast Cancer Metastasis. Gilkes DM, Chaturvedi P, Bajpai S, Wong CC, Wei H, Pitcairn S, Hubbi ME, Wirtz D, Semenza GL. Cancer Res. 2013 Mar 28. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 23539444. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23539444
  • Simultaneously defining cell phenotypes, cell cycle, and chromatin modifications at single-cell resolution.Chambliss AB, Wu PH, Chen WC, Sun SX, Wirtz D.FASEB J. 2013 Mar 28. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 23538711.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23538711
  • Interstitial friction greatly impacts membrane mechanics. Wirtz D. Biophys J.2013 Mar 19;104(6):1217-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 19.PubMed PMID: 23528079; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3602747.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23528079
  • Functional interplay between the cell cycle and cell phenotypes. Chen WC, Wu PH, Phillip JM, Khatau SB, Choi JM, Dallas MR, Konstantopoulos K,Sun SX, Lee JS, Hodzic D, Wirtz D.Integr Biol (Camb). 2013 Mar;5(3):523-34. doi:10.1039/c2ib20246h. PubMed PMID: 23319145 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23319145
  • High-throughput secretomic analysis of single cells to assess functional cellular heterogeneity. Lu Y, Chen JJ, Mu L, Xue Q, Wu Y, Wu PH, Li J, Vortmeyer AO, Miller-Jensen K, Wirtz D, Fan R. Anal Chem. 2013 Feb 19;85(4):2548-56. doi:10.1021/ac400082e. Epub 2013 Feb 1. PubMed PMID: 23339603; PubMed Central PMCID:  PMC3589817.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23339603\